BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Computer Software Solutions Ltd <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:47:09 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
LLoyd Spear wrote:
 
>MOST EXPERIENCED BEEKEEPERS FEEL THAT IF THE BEES HAVE INITATED SWARMING
>PROCEDURES IT IS TOO LATE TO TAKE ACTION AND THEY WILL EVENTUALLY SWARM
>REGARDLESS OF THE ACTION ...
 
I attended a lecture on beekeeping last night. The instructor recommended
the Artificial Swarm (Pagden System), which is carried out after the bees
show evidence of swarming intentions.
 
I agree, that cutting out queen cells and shaking out bees on a regular
basis is not the approach, for me at any rate, since I am in a suburban
garden environment and the effect on the bees vis a vis the neighbours could
be unacceptable.
 
It seems to me, that the Demaree or Snelgrove systems should be used to head
off the bees, or the Pagden System should be used if the bees have started
the process. (My mention of the Jenter System in this context was an error
on my part - thank you!.)
 
Thanks to Aaron Morris for his account of the Snelgrove system which I came
across last night when I was reading up some of the print outs I got from
the BEE-L archives. It now means more to me than when I first read it.
 
Sincerely
Tom Barrett
49 South Park
Foxrock
Dublin 18
Ireland
 
e mail [log in to unmask]
Tel + 353 1 289 5269
Fax + 353 1 289 9940
 
Latitude  53 Deg 16' 12.8" North
Longitude 06 Deg  9' 44.9" West

ATOM RSS1 RSS2