BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:54:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Dave writes:
Why are US beekeepers so derogatory about supecedure? Why is it a "problem"?

If you are trying to maintain a certain line of bees in your hive - hygienic
for example - the first time they supercede the trait is basically lost.
(You can't raise collies if you let the mom out the back door at night.)
Further, if you spend a lot of money on queens you want to get more than a
couple months out of them.

If you are trying to develop a healthy acclimated stock, without selecting
lines, natural supercedure would be a good thing. In the pre-mite days I
regarded a supercedure queen as an excellent queen if she was laying
properly and the bees weren't mean. Now we are trying to raise
mite-resistant bees using breeder queens and subsequent selection.

pb

ATOM RSS1 RSS2