BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John E III Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Aug 1995 11:00:11 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
W. G. Miller wrote, in part:
 
> Now for the good news:   AFB contaminated equipment can be decontaminated.
>  In Maryland, the Dept. of Agriculture has an Ethylene Dioxide (ETO)
> chamber, whichs kills AFB spores and makes the equipment useful again (drawn
> combs and all).  The fee charged is a small fraction of the equipment
> replacement cost.  I have used decontaminated equipment successfully.
>  Hopefully Florida has such a chamber (if not, you should lobby the state
> Dept. of Agriculture.   You can tell them it will make the State some money
> (and beekeepers will be glad to pay it).
 
    Is there a legal/regulatory problem with lugging foulbrood-contaminated
equipment across the Maryland state line from Pennsylvania or Delaware to
use the ETO chamber in Maryland?  Also, where is this chamber located, and
how does one arrange to use it?
 
    I haven't had the problem yet, but it pays to know about these
resources.
 
John E. Taylor III     W3ZID     | "The opinions expressed are those of the
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]      | writer and not of Rohm and Haas Company."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2