There is no vetting for factual accuracy in popular journals. Would that
were so, but it ain't. 



Fully agreed! (not quite on the term consensus)  that's why I am asking.  I
think I see some flaws in the experiment,  but that doesn't mean its an
incorrect assessment.  

I did not see any reference to a control group,  and the test dates indicate
a fall testing.  And not much mention of sample sizes.  Leaving me curious
and wondering a bit.  

Not trying to discredit or argue the information,  but evaluate it and
consider the implications.

Pondering some of them there eltronic gizmos to count.  The research
indicated it was only foragers that are lost.  Were that true you could
count a lot more goings than comings right after a move....



Charlie

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html