BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:30:45 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I've tested the attractivity of various protein dry-fed protein subs.  The
bees have very strong preferences.

Charlie, after experimenting with dry feeding pollen sub, I questioned its
nutritional benefit to the bees once they had made it into beebread (I
don't like to assume things).  So I supplied samples to Patrick Maes and
Dr. Kirk Anderson to run an experiment.  We recently published the results
in Molecular Ecology.

After aging for a short while as beebread, consuming the sub changed the
gut biota of the bees for the worse.
-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2