BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 30 Mar 2003 19:13:30 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
> > Most of the imported  bees were of the Ukrainian bee (Apis millefera
> > acervorum). Smaller amount was the Central Russian bee (A. m.
> > mellifera) and even smaller amount was Caucasian ( both grey and
> > yellow A. m. caucausica and A. m. remipes). Marginally there was
> > also an import of A. m. ligustica (even from Australia).
> >
>
> This is very interesting, Where is this information documented or
> recorded?

Russian sources.

The primorsk bee was described as a bee managing varroa well. It
doesn’t fit with russian sources.

As most were in Primorsk area 400 000 colonies. Varroa jumped
from cerana in Primorsk 1964 and Russians are saying that varroa
is not the biggest problem because they know how to manage that,
because they have lot of treatments to chosse between. They have:
Amicid, Amitraz, Apifit, Apistan, Arachnol, Fenotiazin, Folbex,
Folbex VA, Fumisan, Varrofen, Varrool, Varroton, Varroxan and
Vinin (my question is – why so many formulas when the bee ”can
coupe with the varroa self”?).

Russians are reporting big trouble with chalk brood. Primorsk bee
seems to be succeptible to chalk brood.

Number of bee colonies in Primorsk area

1992 – 334 500
1998 – 106 300
1999 –   66 400


\vov

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2