BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Thom Bradley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 May 1999 08:42:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
        Tom,
        Now we wait while the universities and other researchers provide real
scientific data to help decide such things as dosages and application
methods and strategies. The trick here is to have them help us decide on
a consistent application level that will allow us to efficiently kill
the mites without killing bees or effecting queen laying, supercedure,
etc. Frankly I hope this works well and we then have a mechanical
control for the mites with a food grade substance. Almost too good to be
true.

Thom Bradley
Chesapeake, VA

Computer Software Solutions Ltd wrote:

> Where does the debate now lie?. Is it possible to provide dependable proof
> that FGMO is a viable method of tackling varroa or equally is it possible to
> provide dependable proof that FGMO is not viable.
>

> Tom Barrett

ATOM RSS1 RSS2