BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:28:19 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
>
> >science normally requires a mechanism in place to explain the net
> effect.  Do you have any idea what that might be?  It does counter
> intuitive to me.
>

I suggest that you read the two studies, as the authors elaborate.  I
suspect that it is because it places empty drawn comb immediately above or
adjacent to the brood, which then results in it being warmed and thus more
suitable for the nurses to prepare, and for the queen to lay in, compared
to unheated drawn comb elsewhere in the hive.

--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2