BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 25 May 2003 14:04:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On 25 May 2003 at 1:36, James Fischer wrote:

> What bothers me is that the same people who make and sell the
> bulk of both the QMP and Nasarov pheromones persist in marketing
> "Fruit Boost",
> http://www.pherotech.com/fruit_boost_with_qmp_for_polli.html
> one of the many options offered as "aids to pollination" or
> "bee attractants".  This application of pheromones has been
> shown to not have any significant effect in controlled studies,
> which forces one to wonder why any responsible firm would continue
> to market such products in the face of such conclusions from
> impartial and experienced scientists.

   The biggest problem is that there are often no bees to attract. For
about the same cost (as treating the bloom with the pheromone), a
grower could place a hive per acre, and bee sure.

Dave Green   SC  USA
The Pollination Home Page:  http://pollinator.com

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2