BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:38:04 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>
> >In my opinion, the best queens are hatched in the hive they will be
> heading, and anything else is a compromise.


Allen, I heartily concur!  In my experience, I have greater queen
survivability with those queens that remain with the nuc colony in which she
mated, than with those that I receive in the mail, and successfully
introduce (introduction is apparently not the problem).

I'm not sure if this is due to the fact that I don't work queen nucs into
singles until the queen has been laying for a while, or whether it is
because the queens that I received in the mail simply weren't tested for a
long enough period.

When one is raising queens, a certain proportion will start laying, then
fail in short order.  If queens are pulled and shipped upon commencement of
laying, the buyer will experience those failures.  I would hesitate to blame
the queen producer, since some degree of failure is beyond his control.

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2