BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
josh jaros <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 19:18:14 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Michael Palmer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
"I recently bought a gallon of Bee Quick. I wanted to try it out, because it
is supposed to work in cooler weather than Bee Go."

     Hi Michael,

     I use Bee Quick and have the same problem.  I have never been able to get it to work in cold weather and wonder who told you or where you read that it works better in cold weather than Bee Go or Honeyrobber.  I have never read nor heard that.  I also ran a test with another beekeeper and we had the same results you did.  Bee Quick does work well in warm conditions, although you have to wait a little longer.  I also like to give a few puffs of smoke to get the bees moving first.  You also have to give a few squirts of the stuff every once and a while because it seems to evaporate quicker than Bee Go.  I still prefer Bee Quick but for the commercial operation where time and labour are important, it just isn't feasible.  Mediums are preferred, while deeps seem to be a little too much.  I only run mediums for supers so I don't have a problem.

Josh Jaros




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2