BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:31:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
>> >As you say, maybe the mites would have all died off anyhow.

>Glad to see you open to discussion Allen! 

That's what I'm here for and I learn best when I am proven wrong.

> FWIW, I never said that *all* the mites would have died off. 

Language is ambiguous.  I meant all the mites which I figure I killed would 
have died  naturally, then speculated that there may be some tougher ones
which overwinter.

>When I look at your "average" chart, I see a baseline mite drop level
>typically between 10 and 20 mites per day, punctuated by spikes after you
>treat.  But my point is, if your oxalic treatments were effective, I'd
>expect to see the baseline drop permanently after each treatment, and to
>near zero after four treatments!  That doesn't appear to be the case.

The presence of brood until Nov 24 complicates things (and I'm assuming that
any significant amount of mite rearing in brood is over for now due to lack of 
any evidence of immatures or callow mites in the drops).  The last 18 days or 
so have been broodless (I'm assuming, but will not see evidence of brood 
with mites for 12+ days after).

As I say , the matter is complex and I am not likely to cover all aspects here.  
I reserve that for my diary.

>I'm not concluding whether the treatments worked or not.  I'm just saying
>that your data does not support the hypothesis that they did.

Not yet, anyhow.  And, as you say, maybe the mites would have gone down 
to very low levels naturally.  I have not seen any data on that, other than the 
links I posted in my recent reply.  Those data were under  artificial  conditions 
and may not  apply  to wintering bees in Alberta.  As you say, controls would 
have been very interesting.  

Too bad I stumbled into this project, rather than designing an experiment in 
advance.

> Any plot of natural mite drop over time shows a decrease in winter.  See Fig 3 at
>http://scientificbeekeeping.com/fighting-varroa-reconnaissance-mite-sampling/

Very interesting.  Thanks for that.  I had looked on your site previously, but not 
found that info.  It is what I have been looking for and does challenge my 
conclusions.

It seems that fully indexing a site is an almost impossible task.  I can't  reliably  
find anything on my own site, either, but the search on honeybeeworld does 
work fairly well.

I am not totally convinced, but I see I have some thinking to do about what
is really happening and what others in Alberta have reported in  regard  to 
using oxalic this way.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2