BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:17:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
> Macedo and Ellis (2002) proposed the use of inert dusts to dislodge mites from adult bees. In our work we have used two methods to assess mite infestation in adult bees. The first method consisted of powdered sugar, which was followed by washing with alcohol. Both methods were performed in the same sample of bees. 

> The results showed that the powdered sugar method dislodged only 34.29% of the mites in the sample, while the remaining 61.75% were dislodged by washing with alcohol. Our results differ from those of Macedo and Ellis (2002) and Dietemann et al. (2013), who found both treatment methods to be equally effective.

> In conclusion, our results showed that only the number of Varroa that fell over a 4-day period was significantly correlated with the actual mite population in beehives. The other methods we have evaluated could be useful for indicative purposes, but are not reliable for determining the total Varroa mite population in beehives.

Flores, J. M., Gil, S., & Padilla, F. (2015). Reliability of the main field diagnostic methods of Varroa in honey bee colonies. Archivos de zootecnia, 64(246), 161-166. Chicago	

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2