BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 6 Jul 2013 08:28:44 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> A non-sequitur. The answer I am looking for involves those who actually
are pollinating thecanola and whose bee losses can therefore be directly
attributed to the neonics. It should be a very easy question to answer.

Unfortunately this question reflects such a total misunderstanding of
beekeeping in Alberta and which beekeepers are operating on treated fields
and why, that I have no idea where to start, especially when writing on a
phone.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2