BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Isis Glass <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:36:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
You wrote:
bees were altered in size (bigger) by mechanical means (using different cell
sizes), with genetics, and possibly fed artificial feeds (Sugar syrups and
pollen substitutes)

So far as I know, nobody has ever proven that this has taken place anywhere.
Sure, workers can be somewhat enlarged just as tiny drones can be raised in
worker comb. But would be for that one generation only. Environmental
effects cannot be directly inherited. (Remember Lamark?)

Isis Glass

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2