BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jerry J Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Sep 1993 10:01:46 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Kerry, you must check your e-mail every day.
Glad to see I am not the only one.
 
 
On Thu, 2 Sep 1993, Kerry Clark 784-2225 fax (604) 784 2299 wrote:
 
> I don't know of any study that compared the 2 specific conditions you mention,
> but Dr. Tibor Szabo, Agric. Cda. Research Stn Beaverlodge Alberta (now at Guelph
> Univ. Ontario) did 2 years of tests to determine the maximum distance that
> queens (from small, droneless nucs) would fly to connect with drones. The nucs
> were distributed in a forest with no honey bees, at varying distances from
> normal apiaries.
>
> Perhaps someone can quote the reference to the published article, or other
> details, but my recollection is that queens within 10 km were usually well
> inseminated, then there was a zone of less complete mating, to a further 10 km.
> One queen was well mated at about 20 km.
>
> Queen breeders have observed that nucs with virgin queens will attract drones
> from nearby colonies.
>
> Kerry Clark, Apiculture Specialist
> B.C. Ministry of Agriculture
> 1201 103 Ave
> Dawson Creek B.C.
>         V1G 4J2  CANADA          Tel (604) 784-2225     fax (604) 784-2299
> INTERNET [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2