BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:04:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
...  Chris Mullin and his cooperators at 
Penn State University (ABJ Abstract #20)  
have been reverse-engineering some pesti-
cide formulations and testing some of the 
common “inert ingredi-ents” for honey bee 
toxicity.  N-methylpyr-rolidone (NMP) was 
the first to be empha-sized.  The researchers 
found that NMP is toxic to honey bees, 
especially so for brood.  With a bit of NMP 
in the commercial form-ulations, Bravo®
as four times as toxic to brood as the 
active ingredient chlorothalonil is by itself.  
Tactik® also was four times as toxic to 
brood as was straight Amitraz.  As I 
mentioned earlier, it is going to be very 
difficult to try to regulate pesticides based 
on potential danger to bees when so many 
inert ingredients and adjuvants are compli-
cating the picture. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2