BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Many unanswered questions
From:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:31:21 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
 
 Not true at all. Jeff Pettis published
 this one a few years back, and it's been mentioned many
 times


Did you look at the data in that report?  You original post was in reference to 60%viability

Petis paper shos no classification as “failing” until below 50% as i read it.

Any links to whay historical viabilty is?  There is always going to be a distribution curve. But it seems to me have no baseline?

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2