BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: BEE-L Digest - 15 Jul 2000 to 16 Jul 2000 (#2000-192)
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:13:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
At 12:01 AM 7/17/00 -0400, Ron Law wrote:
>Bee product suppliers are doing themselves a disservice by
>putting warning labels on products regarding people allergic to bees -- no
>such allergy exists regarding bee products.*

*This statement is unclear. Are you saying that there are no allergies to
bee products *or* are you saying that allergy to bee venom would not
produce allergy to bee products. Many people are seriously allergic to bee
collected pollen and also, to royal jelly. These may not be the same people
as those allergic to bee stings, but they do need to be warned.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Peter Borst
[log in to unmask]

! new photos at:
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/plb6/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ATOM RSS1 RSS2