BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kerry Clark 784-2225 fax (604) 784 2299" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Oct 1995 09:20:00 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Regarding the question and answer below:
At the 1991 American Bee Research Conference, Royce, Rosignol and Stringer
described a small dome-top chamber that provided indirect light within
its upper half. Drones would hover in the chamber, and if a tethered queen
was introduced, copulation could result.
   Perhaps further progress has been made since then.
Try contacting Lynn Royce at the Dept of Entomology, Oregon State U.
Corvallis , Oregon 97331
 
 
Kerry Clark, Apiculture Specialist
B.C. Ministry of Agriculture
1201 103 Ave
Dawson Creek B.C.
        V1G 4J2  CANADA          Tel (604) 784-2225     fax (604) 784-2299
INTERNET [log in to unmask]
 
 
 
On Tue, 8 Aug 1995 11:23:05 +1000, Kieren Sunderland wrote:
 
>Has anyone attempted to use, or heard of any success with mating queens in
>an enclosed area to achieve large scale controlled matings.
>
>Regards
>
>Kieren Sunderland
>Dubbo
>New South Wales
>[log in to unmask]
>Kieren Sunderland
>Dubbo
>New South Wales
>[log in to unmask]
 
Friends,
Maybe it will be interresting for you that Johan Gregorius Mendel did this
experiments in the garden of the monastry in Brno. He was not successfull
as others later were not, too.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ptacek
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2