BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barry Birkey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 Aug 2000 11:54:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Taken from the Flordia Beekeepers egroup.

----------
From: "tomas mozer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 16:32:30 -0000
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [FloridaBeekeepers] Re: Digest Number 82

at the eas meeting last week, j.baxter of usda/weslaco(tx) beelab
announced that tolerance levels would be set at 100ppb in honey and
100ppm in wax, more than double the levels found under worst-case
scenarios in studies...restrictions on use in comb-honey production
to be lifted but the 2-week post-treatment lag remains in place...
however, (if) these residues are cumulative, especially in broodcomb/
beeswax, dose/frequency of treatment could affect development of
coumaphos-resistant mites (already reported in europe?)...another
study to be presented at the abrc was to report preliminary results
showing use of coumaphos in queen-rearing operations resulted in
smaller/lighter queens...yet another presentatin on the use of
household products to control beetle larva indicated that bleach and
detergent solutions sprayed on comb were effective (no field test or
residue check but bees in lab were working comb 24-48hrs. later),
whereas water (control)and vinegar solution actually stimulated
larval activity!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2