Since I started this topic
a reply to several responders
mine is in bold lettering

James Fischer who wrote:   I need only two words to completely address the
above - "irreversibe binding".


*I beg to differ since not all receptors have been permanently deactivated
nor can you do so regardless.*


 Charles  Linder wrote:

>While wanting to say its not the same,  you first off miss the big picture
>of the study,  which is that neonics themselves are not causing problems,
>AND the options are much worse.

>>Secondly,  you still miss the issues that are huge problems,  namely Varro
and PPB.


R*ight  on Charles,  just addressed an audience   here in Ontario, and used
almost the same words including PPB.*


Bill Truesdell  wrote:

Citation please.


*Agreed Bill, they're all smoke and no fire,  lemmings!*



Ted Hancock wrote:

I agree with the suggestion that honey bees are low on the priority list of
today's farmers.


*Don't know where you get that from,  Farmers here in Canada are fed up
with being bullied by the very ppb's that they let onto their properties to
make a living or have fun.   The guys I work with are very much in tune
with their surroundings .*



N Wicker  wrote:

Would you mind explaining what beekeeping practices you believe are
problematic (and why)? I am not trying to dispute, just clarify since I
wasn't
sure to what you were referring.


*Statement  indicating a need for more experience  and then it will  become
self explanatory.*



Walter

littlewolfapiaries.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html