BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barry Donovan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:05:03 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Allen Dick has several times mentioned the apparent success of the
Lusbys with their bees on 4.9 mm. But what is meant by success? Success
to me would not only be maintaining colonies without using chemicals or
manipulations to control varroa, but would also mean obtaining good
crops of honey. Have the Lusbys achieved this? In other words, what are
their honey yields like compared with bigger bees where varroa is
controlled chemically?

Recently Dee said something to the effect that in their current
drought, her bees were storing honey when others in the State were not.
So does this mean that her yields are even better than bees from bigger
foundation?

Regards,
Barry Donovan
Canterbury Agriculture and Science Centre
Lincoln
New Zealand.


______________________________________________________
CAUTION: The information contained in this email is privileged
and confidential.  If you read this message and you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of all or part of the
contents is prohibited. If you receive this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately.

Any opinions or views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender and may not represent those of their employer.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2