BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:20:26 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
>
> >I understand this but why did Seely use four combs and not say one as in
> your case or two as in Nick Calderone's case?

Seeley wasn't testing drone removal as a varroa control measure.  He just
wanted to determine the effect of unlimited drone production in colonies.

> If this is the case, then [freezing] would help those who have posted and
talk about loss of stores, nectar and pollen

There is virtually no pollen in those combs, and in my design, no nectar,
either.  Using cut-out trap frames gets around the hassle, comb swapping,
and freezer space issues.  I feel that it would be unwise to add yet another
frame swap between colonies.

Randy Oliver

*******************************************************
* Search the BEE-L archives at:                       *
* http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l *
*******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2