BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Brenchley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:23:22 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
In a message dated 28/03/05 23:15:05 GMT Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:

<<It, however, raises the
question of why does the same stock  show susceptibility to chalkbrood in
Canada but when used in Australia does  not show the same problem?  Climate?
Management?   Nutrition?  Old infected combs?

Trevor  Weatherhead
AUSTRALIA>>



Climate could be a possibility, or the way the bees  are kept. When I first
had bees, I had chalk at low levels. I also had  condensation in the hives in
winter, due to the damp British climate. I put the  hives on mesh floors, which
eliminated the condensation, and also,  ince=identally, eliminated the chalk,
at least in that strain. I've no idea  whether dampness could be a factor in
the sort of levels of chalk we're hearing  about here, but it might be worth
considering.

    Regards,

    Robert Brenchley

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2