BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:46:31 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
>> Are winter losses necessary to evaluate varroa tolerance?  I think not. 
>> Are there not surrogate tests that allow for tracking anti-varroa 
>> performance without sacrificing the hive?

> It is commonly assumed that the Aug/Sept varroa, by interfering with the 
> production of "winter bees" kills the hive that would have otherwise made 
> it. IMHO wintering is all.

Since my question is quoted, I am assuming that this is meant as a reply, 
however I do not understand what it has to do with what I ask.  Maybe you 
could elaborate?

My understanding is that there are many ways to observe mite tolerance and 
select top performers that do not involve letting susceptible hives die or 
even come close to death.  The failure by many to understand that fact 
results in the either/or option that many present as our only choice, and 
which polarizes the discussion into extremes.

I say there is a middle path, actually many middle paths.

Live and let die is not the only way to select for varroa tolerance.
 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2