BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Rossander <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:11:17 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
The full paper is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814613019201
 
There was NO attempt to normalize for differing management practices.  That was not the point of their analysis.  It was a false assumption to have guessed that "both the 'GMO' and 'conventional' crops were treated with similar levels of Round-Up (Glyphosate)".  They were not.  The Round-Up-ready crops were subjected to substantially higher levels of glyphosate during cultivation than the other crops in the study.  So, yes, the paper does merely detect differences in cultivation practices.
 
That does not necessarily make the paper a "blatant sham" but it does highlight the dangers of jumping to conclusions based on an abstract rather than based upon the full information.
 
Mike Rossander    

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2