BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Harris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:46:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
>All one needed to do was to knock the mites back to close to zero, and the colony would chug on just fine.

Are you suggesting that a 100% mite infestation (100 mites/100bees)....WITHOUT..... 'knocking the mites back to close to zero'..... and those colonies would keep chugging on 'just fine'....are you?
My point was that a heavy mite infestation, thousands of mites reproducing within an untreated colony can, in and of itself bring about collapse. If you add vectored disease it only gets worse. You disagree? 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2