BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:25:42 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 1). 4 treatments a year (as Bob H. suggested for
> pollinators)
> 2). 3 treatments a year
> 3). 2 treatments a year
> 4). 1 treatment a year
> 5). 1 treatment every other year


4 treatments a year?  WOW!
From update training over the past 3 years for my training to maintain my pesticide applicator license.  I don’t want to cause a dispute, but pesticide application in most other areas in the ‘art of pest control’ has moved to a only ’treat when needed’ approach.  And routine application was described by the experts teaching the class as wasteful and irresponsible, to treat if there is no effort to assess the need for applying a treatment.  I find it hard to believe that a 4 or 3 treatment per year schedule is reflecting a ‘treat when needed approach‘.   Set schedules, as far as pest control go are always a bad idea and can be dangerous in my opinion.  

Joe


      

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2