BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Jan 2024 11:27:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
this thesis is now 20 years old, but is of interest in context

When statistically significant traits and those traits that have numerical differences are both considered, neither Primorsky Russian nor Ontario stocks were superior in all traits. Neither stock had a clear cut advantage in all tested traits, rather the Primorsky Russian honeybees tended to have superior Varroa mite resistance traits while the Ontario colonies had superior economic traits. 

Beekeepers need to use bees that give them the greatest economic benefit. Beekeepers cannot use bees that are only superior in one trait. Rather, they must find a balance of traits including honey production, overwintering, disease resistance and swarming to provide the most economic benefits (Nasr and McRory 1995, van Englsedorp and Otis 2001).

Geoffrey Wilson (2004) A COMPARISON OF PRIMORSKY RUSSIAN, ONTARIO, AND HYBRID STOCKS OF HONEYBEES:

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2