BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Jul 1996 21:08:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
>>Does anyone on the BEE-L know how the quest to have formic acid approved for
>>use in the U.S. doing?
>>The last thing that I read about it was that the studies were in the hands of
>>the quality assurance division of the IR-4 and should have gone to the EPA in
>>March.
>>Ralph Harrison
 
>I attended a seminar a few weeks ago and the consensus among the scientist
>attending, was that formic acid would be approved, at least for limited use,
>by the end of the year.  They made their assumptions based on their
>discussions with the USDA.
>>Frank Humphrey
 
We were told at our association meeting that EPA was holding up the
approval of formic acid and would require many months before approval.  I
wrote to my congressman, he wrote to EPA, & they responded that the
approved producer (will look up the name after EAS next week, if anyone
wants it -- think it is Mann Lake) had not yet submitted a proposal.  I
called the producer, and was told that they had submitted two proposals,
both rejected (EPA doesn't recognize rejected proposals), and that a third
proposal was imminent.  When asked if we might look for approval by this
fall, the answer was: don't count on it.
Dick Chapin
Montrose, PA
Susquehanna Beekeepers' Assn.
 
  (\
 {|||8-
  (/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2