BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 May 2014 08:01:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> And beekeepers would not use Bayer products if it did not benefit them in some way. It's generally a 2 way street.
> That street doesn't go by my place, I don't use treatments.  ;)

Maybe not, but the survival of beekeeping in the US, Europe and New Zealand has depended upon adequate mite control. I submit that if the bee industry in the US had succumbed entirely to mites, that part timers for the most part would have gone down with them. Where do you think swarms come from? Package bees and nucs? 

Further, as in organic gardening and the folks who don't get vaccinated, there is the phenomenon of herd protection. If the herd is protected, unprotected individuals will benefit from the buffer that surrounds them. In other words, if everyone uses  pesticides but you, there are far fewer pests. You get the benefit from their use and the luxury of not having to use them. 

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2