BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:18:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
>    "The highest concentration the lab found in the
>     3 honey samples was 5.46 parts per billion."

We're discussing chloramphenicol, but consider this:

Right now, as I understand this, the concentration of imidacloprid below
which no harm to bees is proven is considered to be about 20 ppb and
beekeepers want to reduce this to 6 or so.

What we have to ask ourselves is this: if -- as many maintain -- 6 ppb
of imidacloprid (or 20 ppb) is harmful to known organisms, then is 5.46
ppb of another man-made molecule necessarily a harmless amount?

Of course the two substances are not comparable in many (most)? aspects,
but AFAIK, neither occurs in nature.

allen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2