BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:55:03 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
(sorry if this is a duplicate - my email program and I are having 
differences....)

allen dick wrote:

>> many of us onboard at the time believe the "thelytoky" results from 
>> Tucson to be flawed.
>
>
> Thanks for the teaser, but now, maybe give us an idea of how they were 
> flawed?
> allen


As I remember, the high school students actually doing the field and lab 
work were told that all bee eggs hatch in three days, so some combs were 
not completely egg-free when hived to test for laying workers. Our 
suggestions to their supervisors on this subject were not welcomed. Oh, 
well, such is the research game.

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2