BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Cherubini <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:51:14 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
In reality, this "new study"  didn't demonstrate a single
bee in California's Central Valley has ever been killed or harmed
by selenium.

Researchers at the University of California at Riverside
merely conducted a lab (not real world field) study
http://eco.confex.com/eco/2008/techprogram/P14672.HTM
involving irrigating certain plants with 1.5 ppm and 3.0 ppm
NaSeO4 and later finding high ppm levels of selenium in the
pollen plus they noted plant effects like significantly reduced
floral display width, anther length and petal width.

From that bit of experimentation the researchers speculated
"Selenium uptake may negatively alter floral traits, rendering 
them unattractive to pollinators or even reducing pollen deposition
and reproduction. If pollinators cannot detect and avoid toxic 
Selenium compounds in the plant tissues they are foraging 
upon and collecting for their progeny, they may suffer similar
adverse effects to those reported in other insect guilds."

So this is a case of researchers looking for a honeybee health
problem before uncovering any real world field evidence
that a health problem exists in the first place.

Paul Cherubini
El Dorado, Calif.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2