BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:42:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
> Because a constant visitor avoids flowers with acceptable rewards, the
behavior is inefficient unless there are constraints such as an inability to
learn quickly or to remember simultaneously how to deal with many flower
types. 


While he may be a bee expert,  he certainly is no wizard on efficiency.
Flora constancy would be much more rapid and efficient than random sampling
of flowers.  Looking for a sugar value and volume.  One the maximum caloric
flower is fond,  it is certainly most beneficial on time and effort to
maximize visits to those flowers until that balance has changed.

Many years as a ME and doing simple time studies would show that.

Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2