BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:32:36 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
> Pollen that has undergone irradiation presumably suffers from the
> above as well.

AFAIK, pollen that has been irradiated properly loses no measurable
nutritional qualities in the process.  IMO it likely loses more in the
*time* it takes to travel to the facility and back than in the irradiation
process, since *time*, and temperature, is the enemy of pollen quality for
bee feed purposes.

> To supply pollen - would it not be best to only use fresh pollen...

Fresh pollen is a major cause of spread of disease.  I learned that the hard
way.  Even if I trapped my own, I would irradiate it before feeding.

And, AFAIK, freezing has no significant negative effect on pollen for bee
feed, but greatly slows pollen's loss of protein and other essential
properties.

allen
A Beekeeper's Diary: http://www.honeybeeworld.com/diary/

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2