BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:38:33 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
--- Dave Cushman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> By changing course, because chalk brood is
> encountered is sidestepping
> the problem. If chalk brood is a fact of life in the
> race being
> experimented on, surely the test should go ahead....

I'm with Dave!

This is excellent 'real world' research that Hans has
done that most beekeepers fighting varroa can relate
to.  Varroa infestations will often be accompanied by
secondary disease.  To perform this test in the
sterile environment proposed by some of the scientists
would not accurately simulate the effects of varroa on
a colony under common everyday conditions.  Those
wanting to understand the factual evidence provided in
the study should be cautious not be distracted by the
sidestepping Johnny Cochran type tactics.



Joe Waggle ~ Derry, PA
Small Cell Beekeeping
‘Bees Gone Wild Apiaries'
http://www.biologicalbeekeeping.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Organicbeekeepers/



__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2