BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:31:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer group in Washington, D.C., has 
challenged many sweeteners in the past. But the group says "there isn't a shred of evidence that 
high-fructose corn syrup is any more harmful (or healthier) than sugar."

"There's very little chemical difference between these two sweeteners, and there's no reason to be 
more afraid of high-fructose corn syrup than regular table sweetener," said David Schardt, the 
center's senior nutritionist. 

As WebMD points out, the report "doesn't prove that the mercury in the tested products came from 
high-fructose corn syrup." Even the researchers who did the study say they can't advise consumers 
to change their diet based on this initial finding. 

Consumer Reports says these studies "are cause for concern" because even low levels of mercury 
exposure can be unsafe. But the editors say "the total health impact remains unclear, and the 
studies pose more questions than answers." 

*******************************************************
* Search the BEE-L archives at:                       *
* http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l *
*******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2