> accoriding to two former N.Y. inspectors that I have contact with, a 
bee inspector if he finds a problem/problems in my yard, can't notify 
other beeks in my area, thats there standing orders.

Yes.  Privacy regulations typically require that inspectors do not 
identify specific offenders until that information becomes public by 
proper means such as a court case or permission is granted by the 
affected party.  If the beekeeper with the problem agrees to be 
identified, then the inspector is at liberty to discreetly inform 
affected parties as to the source, but a good inspector is usually very 
discreet and keeps confidences.  Without respect and confidence from the 
beekeepers in his/her integrity, an inspector cannot function effectively.

However in absence of such permission, inspectors _are_ at liberty to 
mention that a specific region is at risk of a specific threat as long 
as doing so does not point a finger at anyone who does not wish to have 
the problem publicized.

He/she can also approach n earby beekeepers and say that he/she has 
reason to think they should be on the lookout for XYZ without saying why.

I should add, too, that in a healthy culture, where those with disease 
or pest problems are assisted, not punished, that beekeepers often 
approach their neighbours and authorities to alert them and also for 
support.

If your local beekeeper culture is not open and helpful, why not?

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm