BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 May 2007 11:46:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I was going to rant about OA, I'll spare  you 
All methods are not equal, read, study & judge for yourself 
 
Now a update on the lack of larvae 
1.5 d later,w/ extra strong reading glasses, 
in 4/5 nucs I see no larvae older than 1.5d, most 1d & <, 
plenty doubles (2-3%), plenty of large "puddles" (>5%?) 
One nuc no larvae 
So why did the older larvae die? 
Formic? 
Nurse failure? 
Infection in egg, or royal jelly? 
 
So all my planned experiments fall down, 
no easy way to judge success or failure, 
no sure control 
 
Almost no STR to be seen 
 
dave 

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2