BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:30:03 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
>
> >Most tactic use I hear of comes from California.


Here is a dose of reality, Bob.  The Penn State team, analyzing 238 comb
samples, detected amitraz (Taktic) in 60% of them.

The initial beebread sampling by the USDA for 2012 from the states
of Alabama, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, New York, South
Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin found amitraz in 27% of samples (it
would have been higher if they had only sampled commercial beekeepers, or
had sampled after treatment).

The only way that there are going to be amitraz residue detects in those
combs is if the beekeepers had applied amitraz illegally.  Welcome to
reality!

Bob, since the successful commercial beekeepers that you know don't use
amitraz, it would be of great benefit to the List if you could tell us
which products that they are having success with, the amounts that they
use, and when and how often they apply them.

--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2