BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Edward E. Southwick" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <BEE-L@ALBNYVM1>
Date:
Wed, 16 May 90 09:41:57 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
The question about pollution-free pollen is an interesting one!  Oviously
you do not want to take pollen (or honey for that matter) from hives located
downwind from highways, power plants, chemical or other factories.  So I
would think the best pollen/honey for consumption would be that taken from
rural areas (try Arizona, Canadian provinces, northern California, OR, WA,
S. America, etc).  Several good refs follow:
Molzahn, D. et al.  1989.  Transfer of radioactive cesium from soil to rape
plants, rape blossoms, and rape honey.  Apidologie 20:473.
Bromenshenk, J.J. et al.  1985.  Pollution monitoring of Puget Sound
with Honey bees.  Science 227:632.
Free, J.B. et al.  1983. Using foraging honeybees to sample an area
for trace metals.  Environ. Internat. 9:9.
Hill, D.W. et al.  1981.  Metals in honey produced and marketed in
Connecticut.  Univ. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta Res Rpt 68:1-8.
 
cheers, e.e. southwick
==================================================================
º  Edward E. Southwick             Department of Biology         º
º  Phone 716-395-5743              State University of New York  º
º  FAX   716-395-2416              Brockport, New York 14420     º
º  BITNET SOUTHWIK@BROCK1P         U.S.A.                        º
==================================================================

ATOM RSS1 RSS2