BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:00:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
> but our findings do raise new concern about the impact of agricultural neonicotinoids on wild bumble bee populations.
> ...and the EU overreacted?  I think not!

Did you read the quote?

> In contrast, bumble bees progressively developed over time a dose-dependent reduction in feeding rate with declines of 10ā€“30% in the environmentally relevant range of up to 10 g lāˆ’1, but neither their locomotory activity nor longevity varied with diet.

Doesn't this say they actually avoided taking poison laced syrup? And that no ill effects were seen in any case? Isn't that what it says?

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2