LISTSERV - BEE-L Archives - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

	LISTSERV Archives
	BEE-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Recent work on sampling for varroa
From:	Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:20:06 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (17 lines)

> The results showed that the powdered sugar method dislodged only 34.29% of the mites in the sample, while the remaining 61.75% were dislodged by washing with alcohol. Our results differ from those of Macedo and Ellis (2002) and Dietemann et al. (2013), who found both treatment methods to be equally effective.


Hmmm  seems to me a very poor statement.  Any beekeeper knows treating mites on bees with  alcohol  does not have the same effects as powdered sugar for treatment.


If your looking to count mites,  Sugar in a solid jar shaker is about 80% effective.  Randy has some great numbers on it I am sure.

I hate the sugar for a simple reason,  when your done,  if you shook hard enough to get the mites,  those bees are pissed......

Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM