BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Hesbach <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:48:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
>Of interest, it does appear to work the other way around--bees selected for
VSH tend to exhibit better FKH.  Not surprising, since VSH appears to be
very much based upon the olfactory sensing by the nurses of pupae that are
not developing properly.


In this study, the findings indicate a stronger hygienic response to brood cells with two foundress mites. I think this supports an olfactory component is at play in detection.  But is it possible that it's a mite pheromone instead of defective pupae? 

>The bees uncap brood cells and remove larvae or pupae infested with one or two mites. The removal response of worker bees was stronger towards brood cells containing two mites than cells with one mite. 

>Boecking, O., Drescher, W. (1992) The removal response of Apis mellifera L. colonies to brood in
wax and plastic cells after artificial and natural infestation with Varroa jacobsoni Oud. and to
freeze-killed brood.

Bill Hesbach
Cheshire CT.   

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2