BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Yarnell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:21:51 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (23 lines)
I can think of one good reason: the example it would set.  People who saw
you do it but who were unaware of the difference between your non-viable
"truck stop" swarm and a real swarm might quit calling bee folks to
salvage swarms.  "Nuke 'em, Jack.  It's what bee keepers do, I saw 'em do
it once."

Even though the public doesn't know the details, they seem to be aware
that a swarm is something to be saved (and removed to a remote place.)


On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Allen Dick wrote:


> If the bees are not to be saved, I'm wondering why you don't just use a
> garden sprayer with soapy water.  The bees die instantly and there is no
> stinging, no need to climb, no disposal problem, and no bees left behind.

---------------
Richard Yarnell, SHAMBLES WORKSHOPS | No gimmick we try, no "scientific"
Beavercreek, OR. Makers of fine     | fix we attempt, will save our planet
Wooden Canoes, The Stack(R) urban   | until we reduce the population. Let's
composter, Raw Honey                | leave our kids a decent place to live.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2