BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Further on the second neonic paper
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Jul 2017 01:00:29 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
>
> >Randy, I read directly from the paper, and I just don't see the quote you
> offered.  I am confused as to what you are reading????


Download the supplemental material, in which they describe their materials
and methods in detail.  It is also obvious that there weren't approximately
25 colonies in each group from the graph.  The giveaway that made me
question the graph was the percentages--all the data points fell exactly on
either 20% divisions (the control group of 5 colonies) or 25% divisions
(the test group of 4 colonies).

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2