On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:23:24 -0400, allen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>IMO, a tester should have an average beekeeper or group of average beekeepers 
>administer the treatment without direct supervision and observe, especially 
>if the product is one that seems to need a whole lot of expert help to achieve 
>consistent and positive results.  Otherwise, the results merely demonstrate 
>what an expert can achieve under optimal conditions, not what the guy on the 
>street will see when he gives the product to a his/her semi-literate and non
>English-speaking Mexican help to apply at a remote site. 
>
 here is a link to what average beekeepers are finding

http://www.beesource.com/forums/showthread.php?255914-MAQS-Checkbacks

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm