BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:30:04 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
>>The above plan was given to me by a large beekeeper in another 
country which has been through contaminated pollen issues in the past.
He also gave advice on further testing which would be expensive but 
*may* be done.

Has the CCD team tested frame-stored pollen from CCD dead-outs for 
possibly high pesticide levels?

>>A version of the above is too strip supers and move only the best 
yards out of harms way and let the other half dwindle. depopulate and 
use after supers are pulled to rebuild in spring.

Provided the equipement from dwindled colonies is not contaminated 
with pesticides or pathogens, right?

Waldemar

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2